Conservative Plays

I've been dismayed lately, as many of us have been, by the low interest rates we're getting on our CDs and savings accounts in the U.S. If we are retired or approaching retirement, we may be especially upset by these low rates.
Fortunately, we have options. Even in today's low interest rate environment, many stocks and funds offer attractive dividend yields. Especially the emerging market high yield funds, comprising of both bonds and stocks, seems to be a better bet than staying within U.S. confines.

I would never advocate putting all of your eggs in any one of them, but rather to spread around a good chunk of your savings in these assets if you need current yield. As discovered by my pal Phil DeMuth, and often utilized in his rapidly growing client base at Conservative Wealth Management, here are a few options for high current yield with safety.

The iShares Lehman Aggregate Bond (AGG) exchange traded fund (ETF) largely owns bonds of investment grade and steers well clear of the subprime mess. Experts are expecting more defaults on bonds through next year, but the default rate lately has hovered at or close to zero so even a jump will not significantly affect a large mix of bonds. AGG's trailing twelve month yield (TTMY) is 4.8%. (Note: The trailing twelve month yield, used throughout this column, is not the same as the current yield. As the price fluctuates, the yield changes even if the dividend stays constant or rises. Check with Yahoo! Finance for the latest yield figures.)

The Cohen & Steers Dividend Majors (DVM) ETF is comprised of many high yielding real estate investment trusts (REITs). As any reader of this space knows, I love REITs for their yields. Yes, I know they took a huge drop last year. But that only increased their yield. They are recovering now and so the yield is falling. But the trailing twelve month yield is 6.5% and that looks good enough to eat.

BlackRock Global Energy and Resources (BGR) holds high yielding energy stocks from all over the globe. I happen to think oil prices are in a bubble (I could well be wrong). But even if they are, with a yield like 8.7%, BGR could lower its dividend and still be doing fine.

Templeton Emerging Markets Income (TEI) contains bonds of emerging markets. These bonds are often issued by nations that are in better economic shape than the US is right now by virtue of running budget surpluses and trade surpluses. With a yield of 9.1% it's good enough for me and own it I do.

Black Rock Dividend Achievers (BDV) is comprised of high dividend stocks. It has an amazing yield of 6.9% and while its price will fluctuate like mad as markets move, its yield is positively mouth watering.

Great Northern Iron Ore (GNI) mines, well, iron ore, in Northern Minnesota. Its 6.9% dividend rate tells us that world demand for iron ore remains robust.

BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) pays you a royalty on the oil taken from a series of oil fields near Prudhoe Bay. Its yield for the past 12 months was a stunning 10.4%. As the price of oil rises, it could do even better but might not as a ratio of price.

Bank of America (BAC), the nation's second largest bank, has been stung by sub-prime and other poor investments. It's possible that it will cut its lofty 7.1% dividend, so if you are really, really cautious, you might wish to stay away. Even if it were cut by 20%, however, it would still yield north of 5%, which isn't bad at all.

Consolidated Edison (ED), which New Yorkers know as Con Ed, is an immense electric utility. It's paying a fabulous 5.6% yield. It is regulated, although not as much as it once was, so the yield is fairly safe.

General Maritime Transport (GMR), a firm that transports oil, that most precious of commodities, across the seas, pays a 6.9% yield. Looks good to me.

Now, the REITs mentioned here will not, repeat NOT, qualify for the super low Bush dividend taxation rate. Neither will the oil royalty trusts. And neither will the bond fund at the top (AGG) or in the middle (TEI). But the yield on all these remains excellent.

The strategy here is to not buy just one of these investments. As always, diversify. I would also highly recommend that you talk to your own financial advisor, and you should have a financial advisor. He or she may have his or her own ideas. But this is a start towards a Stein/DeMuth High income portfolio you might like.

Size Matters

These days, it seems like everyone is just throwing out ETF's like cinnamon sprinkles. Throw some out there, and see which one sticks. Well, although ETFs are great tools (I've emphasized thsi point in previous articles) to invest in a sector without the risks of company specific problems, don't just choose one based by names.

As of May 1, there were 107 industry-specific ETFs providing exposure to more than 30 different industries, according to a Morgan Stanley report released this week. By design, industry-specific ETFs allow investors to own a basket of stocks in a given slice of the economy.

Initially, two ETFs may appear to be similar by name, but the formulas behind their underlying indexes can result in very different portfolios. Most ETFs are weighted by market capitalization, which means larger companies receive greater representation in the index. But in an equally weighted fund, all stocks carry the same weight, regardless of a company's size, earnings, or revenues (so you'll find more small companies in equally weighted ETFs).

Here's an example of how this plays out. Two retail ETFs: the equally weighted SPDR S&P Retail ETF (symbol XRT), which includes 53 companies, and the Retail HOLDRs Trust (symbol RTH), which has no underlying index and holds just 18 stocks.

Because the S&P fund includes more small companies, it's heavily exposed to apparel--a more cyclical slice of the industry. Companies with market capitalizations of under $5 billion make up 60 percent of the fund, versus just 7 percent in the HOLDRs fund. In that ETF, retail giants Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Target, and Walgreens account for half of the portfolio.

That being the case, do check under the hood with these ETFs. When in doubt, go with the larger names. The bigger companies tend to do better in recoveries, becaue of their size and economy of scale. Plus, at the very least, you've probably heard of Coca Cola or Boeing.

Here's some top picks.

iShares DJ US Oil Equipment & Services (IEZ) holds 55 companies in the Dow Jones Wilshire 2500 Index that are suppliers of equipment or services to oil-field and offshore platform companies.

Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy (GEX): tracks the Ardor Global Index, which includes 30 global companies involved in alternative power production and supporting technologies. The fund will always have 30 percent of assets in non-U.S. companies located in at least three different countries.

PowerShares Water Resources (PHO): tracks the Palisades Water Index, which includes U.S.-listed companies involved in water supply and treatment, and in technologies or services associated with the water industry. At least 80 percent of the index's components must derive at least 50 percent of revenues from water-related activities.

Financial rebound

After free-falling for more than 6 months, has the financial sector stocks finally bottomed? Well, YES.

The financial sector crises, consisting of subprime mess and other credit problems, has driven down the sector more than 30% since last December. Now with all the surprises out of teh way, it looks like the sector is looking to rebound in the second half of the year.

There will be more bad news, yes, but not surprises. As the impact from Fed rate cuts start reflecting, and companies take measures to remedy the losses, this sector is headed for a rebound.

The world's largest financial group, Citigroup, is considering selling its Japanese consumer finance company CFJ KK or cutting the unit's business significantly as part of its plans to shed assets, Japanese daily Nikkei reported on Sunday. This is another bold move to cut the losses, and rebuilding for the future.

The biggest U.S. bank is aiming to unload $400 billion of assets within three years after being hit hard by flagging mortgage and credit markets.

Market in W-shaped rebound

Many gurus in recent weeks have come out with predictions that the market has bottomed, and is ready to rebound. Although anything is possible, the likelihood of a rebound is somewhat unlikely in my opinion. For one thing, the stock market started its decline, if not a crisis in the last days of 2007 and continued well into March of this year. The market dropped more than 20% from its peak of Dow at 14000. Now, as bad as that sounds, a market that has troubles in wide-reaching credit system, real estate bubble, worthless dollar, and inflation in almost everything in a daily need, is one that would certainly drop more than it has so far.

Looking back at the Nazdaq bubble in 2000, many "gurus" also said the market has bottomed is ready for a rebound every time there is a technical rebound. Note that the Nazdaq did not drop from 5000 to 1200 overnight, but it did so with several 1-2 month rallies in between, but only to drop even further when the steam runs out. Traders and fund managers on Wall street hates to see their portfolios drop double digits, and tends to sell at managebal losses and re-balance their portfoilios. Everytime they do that, there is a rally in specific sectors (usually the ones that has dropped the most, getting funding from trades who sold their losses in other sectors that dropped less) and thus bidding up the market. Therefore, the "rebound" we're getting in this couple weeks, really is a technical rebound and one that is NOT sustainable. Especially when many traders go on vacation in the summer, when the market tends to drop in allmost every summer, we will see this rebound dissipate. That would prove a real buying opportunity for the bulls. I would predict 4Q 2008.

Furthermore, the Fed has pretty much ran out of ammo by cutting the interest rate to 2%. Cutting anymore, would cuase a widespread infaltion that is beyond remedies.

The Fed cut rates to 2 percent this week from 5.25 percent in September. With the value of the dollar falling against foreign currencies, and rising commodity costs pressuring consumers at the gas pump and the grocery store, the central bank wants to steer clear of actions that will push prices up even more.

By lending directly to banks, the Fed can provide capital that banks need to lend to consumers and businesses without fueling higher prices in industries that don't.

By relieving the seizure plaguing financial markets, the Fed hopes it can free up the cash many banks are hoarding. This would presumably encourage banks to lend their money out through mortgages or business or car loans.

Recent months have seen surging food and energy costs. Wall Street is concerned that the threat of inflation and the persistent struggles of the housing market would force consumers, who account for about 70 percent of U.S. economic activity, to spend less.

The Fed said Friday it would boost the amount of emergency reserves it supplies to U.S. banks to $150 billion in May, from the $100 billion it supplied in April. The Fed took this action and several other moves to boost credit in coordination with the European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank.
But even after the Labor Department said the U.S. economy shed 20,000 jobs last month -- fewer than expected -- stocks had a lukewarm response. That suggests that, like the Fed, investors aren't sure the credit crisis has been contained.

So be cautious in this market right now, and don't rush into buying stocks. Especially ones that has seen a rebound in recent weeks, as this market is certain to do a W-shaped rebound, before it really takes off into another bull run.